Difference between revisions of "Web Technologies"
From Jtkwiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Created page with "== Wicket == * [http://wicket.apache.org/ Wicket home (Apache)] === Notes === On [http://wicket.apache.org/meet/introduction.html Why Wicket?] * The claim that other web fra...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | * [[Struts]] | ||
| + | * JavaScript (aka ECMAScript) | ||
| + | ** [https://developer.mozilla.org/en/A_re-introduction_to_JavaScript A Re-Introduction to JavaScript] | ||
| + | ** [http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4329 RFC 4329] | ||
| + | ** [http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/ecma-262.htm ECMAScript specification] | ||
| + | ** [http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~pxc/%28langinf%29/2006/LI-JavaScript.html Introduction to JavaScript for Java Programmers] | ||
| + | * [http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/ Web Sockets API] | ||
| + | * [http://www.w3.org/Submission/wadl/ Web Application Description Language (WADL)] | ||
| + | * [http://code.google.com/p/skipfish/ skipfish] is a web application tester by Google, described in [http://www.h-online.com/security/features/Testing-Google-s-Skipfish-1001315.html this article by heise security] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
== Wicket == | == Wicket == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 22: | ||
* The separation between HTML and programming (Java) aspects seems very good. | * The separation between HTML and programming (Java) aspects seems very good. | ||
* The "easy to use" and "fun" criteria are obviously rather subjective. | * The "easy to use" and "fun" criteria are obviously rather subjective. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Computing]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:15, 24 December 2011
- Struts
- JavaScript (aka ECMAScript)
- Web Sockets API
- Web Application Description Language (WADL)
- skipfish is a web application tester by Google, described in this article by heise security
Wicket
Notes
On Why Wicket?
- The claim that other web frameworks (or even "plain vanilla" servlet / JSP) don't properly support server-side state seems rather thin. There's nothing much wrong with sessions. However, the perspective of dealing with the back button and multiple tabs / windows seems interesting.
- The separation between HTML and programming (Java) aspects seems very good.
- The "easy to use" and "fun" criteria are obviously rather subjective.
